DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
701 §. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001
ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490
JET
Docket No. 3875-12
26 Nov 12
Dear Master sergeant ma
our application for correction of your
This is in reference to y
f 10 USC 1552.
naval record pursuant to the provisions ©
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval
Records, sitting in executive session, considered your
application on 26 November 2012. your allegations of error and
injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative
regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this
Board. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted
of your application, together with all material submitted in
support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes,
regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the
advisory opinion furnished by HOMC Memo 1560 MFR-1 dtd 7 Jun 12.
a copy of which is attached.
after careful and conscientious consi
record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was
insufficient to establish the existence of probable material
error or injustice. In this connection, the Board substantially
Accordingly, your application has been denied.
votes of the members of the panel will be furnished upon
The Board members also considered your request for a personal
appearance; however, they found that the issues in the case were
adequately documented and that a personal appearance would not
materially add to the Board’s understanding of the issues
snvolved. Thus, your request for a personal appearance has been
denied.
that favorable action cannot be taken.
the Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and
material evidence of other matter not previously considered by
the Board. In this regard, it ig important to keep in mind that
a presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Consequently, when applying for a correction of an efficial
naval record, the burden 1s on the applicant to demonstrate the
existence of probable material error or
Sincerely,
Enclosure
NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 04433 12
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, ici In addition, the Bo advisory opinion furnished by HOMC Memo 1560 of which is attached. ul and conscientious consideration of the entire found that the evidence submitted was blish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Thus, your request for a personal appearance has been denied.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 11359-10
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 29 August 2011. Thus, your request for a personal appearance has been denied. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 04512-12
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your. After careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR2367 13
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 25 November 2013. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when Docket No.NRO2367-15 applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 05906-12
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by CNPC Memo 1780 PERS-314 dtd 2 Jul 12, a copy of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of’ probable material...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2011 | 06670-11
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 12 September 2011. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 07261 12
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considere@ your application on 26 August 2013. In addition, the Board’ considered the advisory opinion furnished by OCNO Memo 1530 Ser N133/168 dated 24 October 2012, a copy of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2012 | 10135 12
Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by HQMC Memo 1560 MFR dtd 4 Mar 13, a copy of which is attached. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the ‘existence of probable material error...
NAVY | BCNR | CY2010 | 13661-10
A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 11 April 2011. Thus, your request for a personal appearance has been denied. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.
NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR8441 13
Furthermore, the Board concurred with the advisory opinion that you “may request to reenlist in the Marine Corps Reserve through: — -a Prior Service Recruiter provided you meet all the requirements . Accordingly, your application has been denied. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.